(just a rhetorical thought)

Do you think that people who are naturally shy and/or passive are like that because, in truth, in our human packs, we need "betas" and "omegas"?

I mean... do you think that it might actually be an inherent thing?
...that over the years, as humans evolved, because we came from a pack-like background, perhaps shyness, insecurity, etc. actually became something certain people are predisposed to... because betas and omegas actually served a vital purpose within the pack... a purpose as vital to survival of the species as the desire to reproduce?

...is it not possible that Betas and Omegas exist for a social reason, as opposed to being "weaker"... that those traits are not negative, but in fact vital and positive? ...that things like insecurity and shyness are actually inherent because of a need for Betas and Omegas, etc.?